It appears that the coronavirus, called Covid-19, has alarmed the world. It has become the bogeyman of the 21st century. In the beginning, it scared the medical profession at the means it swiftly spread as well as killed people. Subsequently, they spooked the federal governments worldwide to take radical actions to enter into various degrees of LockdownLockdown. 


It has been only a socio-economic calamity for most nations. The way the media remains to report this virus infection is causing even more unnecessary panic, chaos, and complication amongst the general public.


In my previous post entitled "Corona- The Making From the Bogeyman," I pointed out how a terrified mind is incapable of sensible reasoning. I also pointed out exactly how an administrative reason is likewise unable of such thought. So it is clear to me that a frightened governmental individual would certainly be two times as incapable of making any reasonable decision. This truth appears from what we have seen in the bureaucratic activity taken by federal governments throughout the world.

What dismays and disappoints me most is the clinical career and the role it is playing. It is expected to take care of individuals' physical and psychological health and wellness, yet is aiding the government to create people's life a lot more miserable. They do not seem to appreciate the truth that saving lives at all costs is not the only thing that matters. One has to consider our decision-making's socio-economic costs; otherwise, our actions come to be detrimental and untrustworthy.

 Countless people have shed their jobs, and millions of businesses have failed. How can we overlook the physical and mental side effects of government administrative action, which creates poverty? Hardship ends up being fertile ground for an increase in criminal offense, physical violence, drug abuse, self-destruction, etc. Please bear in mind that the impact of all these actions is birthed by exclusive individuals, not public servants who are mostly financially untouched.


In my mind, I pertain to the LockdownLockdown as a savage activity. To lockup people residing in high towers for six weeks resembles punishing them to holding cells in their cells. How can we warrant securing individuals on a cruise ship for days for no mistake of their own, even if they have a case of coronavirus on board? If the measures we take remove the infection or eliminates it, or else we are just getting hold of the tiger by the tail, LockdownLockdown can only be justified.

We will certainly locate that they are panic procedures if we check out all the steps we have taken. They do not eliminate the infection or eliminate. The LockdownLockdown only decreases the spread of the disease. It is the nature of all virus infections to spread out. So when we raise the LockdownLockdown, this infection is most likely to spread. The infection contour has to rise. We need to appreciate the reality that this coronavirus is below to remain. We will certainly need to discover how to cope with it as we do with the influenza virus.

So what does the future hold for us? Do we go into LockdownLockdown every single time the infection contour climbs? Do we close down our workplaces and also schools whenever someone is evaluated favorably? Do we remain terrified and again undergo some bureaucratic control until we locate a treatment?


It is effortless for countries with a sporadic and reasonably small populace like Australia and New Zealand to claim success in handling this infection with lockdown procedures. Nonetheless, it is most certainly not a practical proposition in densely inhabited countries with large populations like India and Europe.

Hence there has to be a much better means of managing this trouble. If I found myself in a wilderness nation town and an instance of coronavirus offered to me for therapy, I ask myself, what would certainly I do? Having no diagnostic center provided to me, I would have treated that person similarly as I would undoubtedly have treated an instance of influenza. Would this have caused any different results for my client or me?

One can see that all this screening for the infection in the populace may be academically preferable; nonetheless, the media reports it should be a matter of concern for everyone attempting to enhance our mental health. It is alarming the public and also triggering unnecessary anxiety and even alarm.

Perhaps we can learn from our pet pals how they manage to live peacefully with all the killers around them because of the beginning of time. We see that the lions terrify the buffaloes by chasing them if we look at the buffalos and the lions. As soon as the lions capture the weakest one, the buffaloes stop running. They begin grazing in a loosened up method, recognizing that the lions will not be striking them up until they are starving once again. They do not remain terrified.

I relate to all the viruses hiding in our ambiance as predators waiting to catch us, like the starving lions and tigers. Usually, a healthy and balanced individual will withstand a virus infection relying on one's immune system's toughness. Once any mental or physical factors damage our immune system, we can end up being prey to any such virus. Hence, every individual in society must keep a degree of fitness, safeguarding the person.

Nonetheless, we have do-gooders in society who want to conserve us from ourselves, like the medical career and the federal government. They intend to reveal us and verify that they can save human lives, no matter its cost. There is, of course, a political motive in all this. No person wishes to pass away, so nobody will challenge someone that is going to protect us. Just how can any individual object to such a worthy cause when one is saving lives? Political leaders and the clinical career become our heroes, and also they obtain our votes.

Yes, it is relatively easy to conserve lives and come to be heroes if we believe in a bureaucratic means and overlook our activity's adverse effects. But there are greater responsibilities attached to our medical and political leaders' tasks than just trying to save human lives if they cared to think about Intend you are in charge of a rescue watercraft overloaded with people. You understand that the watercraft is most likely topple and sink if you take one more individual aboard. There are individuals in the sea still begging to be saved. Do you have an option? Please assume. Will you feel like a hero? Do you always count on saving life at whatever the expense?

As I see it, we have to concern terms with the coronavirus and treat it in the same way as the flu infection. The globe can not pay for to stay terrified. In my mind, there is no such thing as the future. The future is what we develop with the actions we take today. Our present becomes the future if we take no action now.

Are we most likely to reassess our strategy to the coronavirus? Are we most likely to stay terrified? Will our political as well as clinical leaders awaken to their obligations? Are we going to proceed with this administrative madness?

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post